U.S.
vows to defend space programs against threats
The
Associated PressPublished: December 13, 2006
WASHINGTON:
The Bush administration asserted on Wednesday its right to use force against hostile
nations or terror groups that use military measures to deny U.S. access to space
for peaceful purposes.
"We reserve
the right to defend ourselves against hostile attacks and interference with our
space assets," Undersecretary of State Robert G. Joseph said in a speech
to the George C. Marshall Institute.
Elaborating
on a new U.S. space policy adopted by President George W. Bush earlier in the
year, Joseph said it does not reflect a hostile approach but rather a call for
meaningful cooperation to benefit all people.
But,
he said, terrorists and enemy states might view the U.S. space infrastructure
as "a highly lucrative target," while sophisticated technologies could
improve their ability to interfere with U.S. space systems and services.
Joseph
did not identify terror groups or nations that might have such motives. His office
said that information was classified.
Space
programs, Joseph said, have yielded such medical benefits as the development of
kidney dialysis machines and insulin pumps.
"The
United States is more dependent upon space than any other nation," he said,
and protecting U.S. interests in space is a national security priority.
"No
nation, no state-actor, should be under the illusion that the United States will
tolerate a denial of our right to the use of space for peaceful purposes,"
he said.
Apart from natural threats,
such as meteors and solar flares, Joseph said other hostile actions, such as jamming
satellite links or blinding satellite sensors, are man-made.
And,
he said, anti-satellite weapons could permanently destroy a satellite while military
force attacking ground relay stations and control systems could make space assets
useless.
At the same time, Joseph, the
senior arms control official at the State Department, said the United States does
not monopolize space or deny access to other nations for peaceful purposes.
He
ruled out negotiating a new space agreement, saying the 1967 Outer Space Treaty
established an effective arms control regime.
The
treaty bans the stationing of weapons of mass destruction in outer space and declares
outer space should be used only for peaceful purposes.
"The
United States views the purposeful interference with its space systems as an infringement
on our rights, just as we would view interference with U.S. naval and commercial
vessels in international waters," he said.
He
did not name countries or groups that
A
new agreement is not necessary, Joseph said. "We should concentrate on real
threats," he said, citing those posed by Iran and North Korea.
"There
is no arms race in space and we see no signs of one emerging," he said.