Pearl Harbor-9/11 Attacks Recalled: The Mind Bridging Treachery Is A Deadly Treason To Watch [II]

Edwin A. Sumcad
November 24, 2006

In spite of our dogged determination to defeat the Axis of Evil in this war on terror, a more deadly attack on the United States is the one that is coming from within. It is mounted by Americans themselves against the United States.

Russia was once most feared nuclear power in the Western Hemisphere since the Monroe Doctrine was declared in place, and was then one of the two most powerful nations on the planet [the United States being one of the two]. It was attacked by Russians themselves from within and the nation imploded; aided by external pressure that was greater than the internal pressure, its once formidable communist power collapsed inwardly. Fragmented from implosion, Russia had democratized, and is no longer the threatening Big Bear hiding behind the Iron Curtain, which with its deadly nuclear armaments used to bully the West.

Historically, the dreaded Cuban missile crisis that held the nation’s breath in a heightened anticipation of Armageddon attested to this when nuclear war was just a finger-button away from what otherwise would have been the end of the world – the world that we know today.

Clearly, it is therefore the mind that breeds and bridges disloyalty and betrayal among Americans themselves that threatens our demise as a nation. In the country, there exists a deadly treason to watch…!!

Internal attacks come from various groups of Americans described by their own activities hostile to the government in particular and whose interests are inimical to the nation’s existence as a constitutionally established corporate entity. By political persuasion, one of those revolutionary groups may be identified as Lefwags [liberal enemy from within against the government], Nerds [not elsewhere recognized destroyers] or aimless AIMs [angry impotent militia] with a figuratively razor-sharp ax to grind.

One of the highest standards of delusional liberalism directed against the United States was said to have been set up by former Vice President Al Gore in his speech delivered in a seminar in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia on February 12, 2006. The gathering was co-sponsored by Osama bin Laden’s family. Check this out in cyberspace. It appears in almost all reputable websites.

The infamous speech pitted militant Arabs against the United States, with Gore defending Arabs that were reportedly victimized in the United States.

Gore said: “Arabs in the United States had been indiscriminately rounded up, often on minor charges of overstaying a visa or not having a green card in proper order, and held in conditions that were just unforgivable…” Then it concluded with a sweeping indictment: “Unfortunately there have been terrible abuses [in the United States] and it's wrong.” [1]

Obviously, this attack gave aid and comfort to Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaeda kill-American robots not only in physical combat but also in psychological warfare, more so when it was timed to boost the enemy’s sagging morale as the nation tightened the nuts and bolts of our national security.

In tandem with delusional liberalism, Nerd attackers advocate a call to arms among fellow-Americans against the Establishment or the government. These are mostly writers that proliferate in the Web whose seditious writings incite readers to civil disobedience if not rebellion; they could be either leftwing liberals or conservative extremists critical of President Bush or of abused civil liberties or of anything at all real or imagined, but mostly identified as protesting Democrats who in promoting their liberal cause and political agenda are kicking the bucket down the road.

Impotent or frustrated militia gripers and idealistic gropers groping for inspirational drives to prop up an otherwise dull routine life are, in their mind, at war with the federal government where they get a kick out of it, but the helpless case is exemplified by the likes of Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City Bomber, and the Unibomber.

Sample the mind of the Unibomber that breeds and attempts to bridge treason with the American public. This is the reasoning or reasons of the Unibomber why Americans should attack the United States as stated in his Manifesto:

“The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in "advanced" countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in "advanced" countries.” [2]

This demented thinking and minds like that of Timothy McVeigh that flipped over the edge – and there are millions of those wayward running loose in the street – are one of the most dangerous attackers to watch. In demonic villainy, they rival Muslim terrorists that blow up airlines and buildings and intentionally target innocent children and civilians in a cult-like religious murder to claim a spiritual reward in heaven. We are referring to “Muslim terrorists” and Islam fundamentalists in their jihad; we are not referring to innocent and peaceful Muslims in our midst who live in peace and harmony with us in our tolerant and free society.

Looking for more copies of Timothy McVeigh on the loose, interesting results of my research put Prof. Ward Churchill, ex-chairman of the University of Colorado at Boulder’s Department of Ethnic Studies, on top of the list of attacking Nerds. He compared victims of 9/11 to Nazis that deserved to die in the terrorist attack.

Churchill called the victims of 9/11 “little Eichmanns”. Adolf Eichmann was Hitler’s architect in sending millions of Jews to the gas chamber.

Know what lurked in the mind of this American aggressor from the academe when he attacked the United States of America:

“[T]he victims [of 9/11] worked for a ‘mighty engine of profit to which the military dimension of U.S. policy has always been enslaved.’ ”

In attacking America, Churchill defended the dead terrorists that perpetrated the carnage against Americans. “[T]errorists who carried out the attacks ‘manifested the courage of their convictions…’ ” He was Osama bin Laden incarnate.

Our response to Pearl Harbor and 9/11 attacks can never be doubted.

The Bush administration put terror’s agenda of wanton destruction and murder on hold. Americans were relatively safer to this day. There was no terrorist attack since 9/11. The path that the Bush administration had chosen to keep America safer has been questioned by the Democrats and their liberal associates’ anti-Bush tour de force. Now that Capitol Hill is controlled by the Democrats, this relatively safer America is now publicly perceived to be gravely in doubt.

The apparent difference of our response to the Pearl Harbor attack from that of the 9/11 attack is that our response to the latter is open-ended. “It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated.” [President Bush… Refer to Note (2)]

We abbreviated the war with Japan by leveling the cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima to the ground in a nuclear holocaust. While we almost wiped out the entire population of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, we save the lives of about a million American soldiers that we would have lost had the war been continued on the ground. If the level of attrition in this war on terror rises to the level of war between Iran and the United States, we probably have no other alternative but to just nuke Iran the same way we did Japan to end the war. If Iran decides to contest the power of our nuclear arsenal, expect a slick of oil to be found on the map where Iran was there once upon a time.

But how can we nuke an internal enemy the like of Churchill that attacks the United States with constitutional impunity? We can neither be as crazy a griper as one who would bomb the City of Oklahoma because the people we hate live there nor burn down the whole house to get rid of termites that gnaw on the foundation of the building where we live, can we?

This drives home my point. The treachery of this kind of surreptitious attack is far worse than 9/11 and Pearl Harbor. Our nuclear power is of no use, and our determination to fight back is of no moment. The more we are determined to counter, the more we implode and collapse from within.

There ought to be a way.