We're
serious about global warming, U.S. says
DEBORAH
ZABARENKO AND JEFF MASON
Reuters
News Service
September
28, 2007
WASHINGTON
-- The United States insisted yesterday that it is serious about global warming
and tried to reassure skeptics that President George W. Bush's gathering of major
polluting nations would not undermine UN efforts.
But
some participants and environmentalists are unconvinced, voicing concern that
Washington is trying to rally support for voluntary emission cuts rather than
the mandatory reductions called for in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol.
"I
want to stress that the United States takes climate change very seriously, for
we are both a major economy and a major emitter," U.S. Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice said at the start of the two-day conference.
"Climate
change is a global problem and we are contributing to it," she said. "Therefore,
we are prepared to expand our leadership to address the challenge."
Outside
the State Department where the sessions were held, dozens of protesters held up
anti-Bush placards reading, "Bush is a criminal" and "Stop global
warming now."
"We're
here to register our protest at this charade," said Greenpeace USA chief
John Passacantando. "President Bush is trying to take the world in the wrong
direction on global warming, and this meeting is nothing more than a propaganda
effort to deflect international criticism."
Diplomatic
security formed a line to stop protesters from entering the building. Nearly 50
demonstrators were arrested.
By
most counts, the United States is the world's top emitter of greenhouse gases.
But Mr. Bush, who rejected the Kyoto Protocol, continues to resist binding targets,
calling instead for voluntary approaches and "aspirational" long-term
goals.
Ms.
Rice said individual nations should set their own goals to curb climate-warming
emissions, especially carbon dioxide from coal-fired power plants and petroleum-fuelled
vehicles.
Critics
questioned whether such voluntary targets would work.
"We
appreciate the sentiments expressed by Secretary Rice, but the devil is always
in the detail," South African Environment Minister Marthinus van Schalkwyk
said.
"That
is still the crux of the difference between the approach of the U.S. and the approach
of the rest of the world," he said, referring to the split over national
versus global targets. "For us, this meeting is obviously to determine if
the U.S. is willing to change [its] approach on that issue."
Chief
United Nations climate-change representative Yvo de Boer told the conference he
thought the discussions could contribute to the UN process.