The
New Bogus Majestic-12 Documents
The
new crashed-saucer documents, like their 1987 predecessors, are riddled with flaws.
Philip
J. Klass
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Majestic Twelve"-better known as "MJ-12"-first achieved international
fame in the world of UFOlogy in mid-1987. It was then that UFOlogist William L.
Moore and two associates made public three (purportedly) "Top Secret"
documents which indicated that President Harry Truman had created a super-secret
MJ-12 group forty years earlier to deal with extraterrestrial (ET) visitors. Truman's
(alleged) action was prompted by an alleged crashed-ET craft that had been covertly
recovered near Roswell in mid-1947.
The
Roswell crashed-saucer claim had been the centerpiece of a book published seven
years earlier (1980) which Moore had coauthored with Charles Berlitz. (Berlitz
previously authored a book describing the "mysterious dangers" of the
Bermuda Triangle.)
Recently,
a large batch of additional "Top Secret Majestic Documents" have emerged,
provided by another UFOlogist named Tim Cooper, who claims he obtained them from
several covert sources. Their authenticity has been endorsed by Robert Wood, a
respected, retired McDonnell Douglas scientist and his son Ryan. (Wood is a member
of the nine-person Executive Council of Peter Sturrock's Society for Scientific
Exploration.) Based on the Woods' assessment, wealthy Silicon Valley software
expert Joe Firmage, who recently revealed his conviction that some UFOs are extraterrestrial
visitors, also endorsed Cooper's documents in mid-1999.
However,
on November 25 the International Space Sciences Organization (ISSO), which Firmage
recently created to pursue his UFO interests, issued a statement that "ongoing
research indicates that many, possibly all, the so-called MJ-12 UFO documents
were officially fabricated as instruments of U.S. covert psychological warfare
. . ." (emphasis added). This is ridiculous! The new Cooper documents, like
their 1987 predecessors, are so riddled with flaws that they could never fool
Soviet or Chinese intelligence experts. Even some long-time pro-UFOlogists have
denounced them as obvious counterfeits.
One
of the original MJ-12 documents released by Moore and his two partners (UFO lecturer
Stanton Friedman and TV producer Jaime Shandera) purported to be a memo from President
Truman to Defense Secretary James Forrestal, dated September 24, 1947, which authorized
the creation of the MJ-12 group. My investigation revealed that the Truman signature
was a pasted-on photocopy of a genuine signature-including accidental scratch
marks-from a memo that Truman wrote to Vannevar Bush on October 1, 1947 (see "New
evidence of MJ-12 hoax," SI 14[2], Winter 1990).
A
second MJ-12 document released by Moore et al. purported to be a November 18,
1952, briefing for President-elect Eisenhower, prepared by Rear Admiral R.H. Hillenkoetter,
who had been director of the CIA and, purportedly, was now head of MJ-12. There
were numerous flaws in the "Eisenhower Briefing Document" (EBD), the
most obvious being its reference to the (bogus) Truman memo of September 24, 1947.
Further,
the EBD repeatedly used a very unusual date-format-a hybrid combination of civil
and military formats with a superfluous comma, i.e., 18 November, 1952. This unusual
hybrid date-format was one repeatedly used by William L. Moore in his personal
letters - until I pointed out this "curious coincidence" in my first
article debunking the original MJ-12 papers (see SI 12[2], Winter 1987-1988).
The third of the MJ-12 documents made public by Moore et al. in mid-1987 purported
to be a brief memo, dated July 14, 1954, from Robert Cutler to USAF Chief of Staff
General Twining informing him of change of date to brief the President on the
"MJ-12 Special Studies Project." Investigation revealed that on the
date that Cutler allegedly wrote the memo, he was out of the country. Moore claimed
that he and Shandera had found the Cutler memo in an unlikely location when they
visited the National Archives. The memo, which had been double-folded, could easily
have been carried into the Archives in Moore's or Shandera's coat pocket. Less
than two years before Moore made public the initial MJ-12 papers-on April 16,
1983-he had confided to then-close friend and UFOlogist Brad Sparks that he was
contemplating creating and releasing some hoax Top Secret documents-as first revealed
in the March 1997 issue of my Skeptics UFO Newsletter. Moore explained to Sparks
that he hoped such bogus documents would encourage former military and intelligence
officials who knew about the government's (alleged) UFO coverup to break their
oaths of secrecy. Sparks strongly recommended against the idea.
It
was not until nearly seven years after release of the original MJ-12 documents
that a new "MJ-12 document" surfaced on March 14, 1994. On that date,
Don Berliner, a long-time pro-UFOlogist, received in the mail an undeveloped roll
of 35 mm film from an anonymous source. When the film was processed, Berliner
found photos of what purported to be copies of pages from a "Top Secret/MAJIC/Eyes
Only" special operations manual (SOM 1-01) intended to inform military crews
how to recover crashed saucers and their ET crews. SOM 1-01, purportedly printed
in April 1954, contains many flaws. For example, it stated that crashed ET craft
should be sent to "Area 51 S-4" in Nevada. But that portion of Nellis
Air Force Base was not given the name "Area 51" until several years
after SOM 1-01 allegedly was printed.
As
a result of numerous flaws in SOM 1-01, a statement denouncing it as counterfeit
was released on March 14, 1999. It was signed by Berliner and several other prominent
pro-UFOlogists. By this time, a new batch of more than a dozen Majestic documents
obtained from Tim Cooper had recently been made public by Robert Wood and his
son Ryan at a UFO conference in Connecticut. They had strongly endorsed the authenticity
of the documents, although Wood admitted that there were flaws in them. But he
claimed that these anomalies "tend to indicate authenticity. . . . [Document]
hoaxers generally try to make sure they are perfect."
No
mention was made by Wood that his long-time good friend, UFO lecturer Friedman
- who remains one of the staunchest supporters of the original MJ-12 documents
- had earlier investigated several of Cooper's documents and concluded that at
least one was counterfeit. Friedman had reported his findings and suspicions about
other Cooper documents in his book Top Secret/MAJIC, published three years earlier.
British
UFOlogist Timothy Good, who in 1987 had strongly endorsed the authenticity of
the original MJ-12 documents in his best-selling pro-UFO book Above Top Secret,
has more recently characterized them as bogus, largely on the basis of the phony
signature on the Truman memo of September 24, 1947. But in the early 1990s, prior
to Good's disavowal of the original MJ-12 papers, he began to receive some of
the "new" Majestic documents from Cooper.
Good's
suspicions about the new Cooper documents were aroused by some factual anomalies
in their content. More important, Good noted that mechanical flaws in the typewriter
Cooper had used to write two letters on October 4 and October 7, 1991, resembled
those of the typewriter used for one of his Majestic documents, allegedly typed
in 1952. At my request, Good provided me with copies of Cooper's two letters for
analysis.
Cooper's
two 1991 letters to Good not only had the same typeface as the (purported) 1952
Top Secret MJ-12 Annual Report, but more importantly the upper-case (capital)
G and N were slightly elevated relative to the adjacent lower-case letters. However,
an experienced questioned document examiner informed me that it was conceivable,
though unlikely, that both Cooper and the 1952 document typist might have failed
to depress the "shift key" to its lowest possible position when typing
G and N.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
However,
both Cooper's letters and the 1952 document also have an "elevated 8"-which
does not require the use of the typewriter's shift-key (see figure 1). This curious
coincidence was reported in the November 1999 issue of Skeptics UFO Newsletter,
a copy of which was provided to Wood. His response of December 13 (via e-mail)
was: "The question is whether that ["elevated-8"] is a characteristic
of that typewriter design as distinguished from any particular machine serial
number. We need other examples from the same typewriter design and I would hope
to find some."
In other words, Wood suggests that this mechanical flaw
was a possible uncorrected characteristic of all of the typewriters produced by
this manufacturer for at least several decades. Nothing further has been heard
from Wood on this key issue since mid-December 1999.
Meanwhile,
Tim Cooper posted a lengthy treatise on the Internet on December 30, offering
his assessment of his "new Majestic documents." Highlights of Cooper's
views are quoted below:
The
question of whether they [Cooper's documents] are genuine, authentic, or real
is not the issue here. The important point . . . is the information contained
in the documents themselves. . . . In my own humble opinion, the Majestic documents
are basically reliable as far as content is concerned with the exception of the
questionable hypothesis that there are other intelligent, thinking, machine building
cultures visiting planet earth on a regular, day to day basis [emphasis added].
Yet
the opening page of the Web site that the Woods have created to promote MJ-12
states: "The Majestic Documents: Evidence That We Are Not Alone. Curious
about the documentary record of military and government participation with UFOs,
wreckage retrieval, and extraterrestrials? This site is all about it! The documents,
the forensics, the military and intelligence history, and stunning validating
evidence. Join us on a journey into the beyond Top Secret world that a government
cabal has been hiding since 1941." (One of Cooper's documents claims a crashed
saucer was recovered in the spring of 1941 near Cape Girardeau, Missouri, six
years before the alleged Roswell Incident. If true, the Eisenhower Briefing Document
completely forgot to mention this historic event.)
