Ignoring
the meat of the global warming issue
NEIL REYNOLDS
We
all emit greenhouse gases simply by breathing - one kilogram of carbon dioxide
a day, on average, per person. Since there are six billion of us, we collectively
emit more than two trillion kilograms of carbon dioxide a year. Scientists don't
hold these emissions against us. What public policy options, after all, exist?
Breath control?
All
animals emit greenhouse gases and by comparison, humans are relatively restrained
respirators. The planet's livestock animals alone, for example, breathe out three
billion tonnes of CO{-2} a year. Livestock, indeed, emit more GHG into the atmosphere
than all of the cars, freight trucks, railways, airplanes and container ships
in the entire world.
In
a comprehensive 400-page analysis, published last year, the UN's Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO) described the spiralling increase in greenhouse gases from
livestock as "massive" and asserted that the world governments must
urgently address the problem. It explicitly chided environmentalists for their
apparent indifference. In essence, the FAO says, livestock have inherited the
Earth - with disastrous consequences.
Together,
livestock animals account for 20 per cent "of terrestrial animal biomass"
- in other words, of all living land creatures, humans included.
Feed
crops take 30 per cent of the world's arable land. Livestock command 70 per cent
of the planet's agricultural land and 30 per cent of its entire land surface.
Directly
and indirectly, livestock account for 18 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions,
the FAO says - more than "all transport" combined. These animals emit
9 per cent of human-induced carbon dioxide, 37 per cent of human-induced methane,
64 per cent of human-induced nitrous oxide and 65 per cent of human-induced ammonia.
Methane has a longer lifespan than carbon dioxide - between 9 and 15 years. Second-ranked
of the greenhouse gases, it has a bad-guy GWP - "global warming potential"
- of 21, meaning that it is 21 times more effective in trapping heat in the atmosphere
than carbon dioxide over a hundred-year period. Nitrous oxide's lifespan is 114
years; its GWP is 296.
And
ammonia is a well-known cause of acid rain.
Animal
husbandry, the FAO finds, "is responsible for the production of gases with
far higher potential to warm the atmosphere than carbon dioxide." These gases
cause other problems as well. Though measured in the atmosphere in parts per billion,
nitrous oxide can overwhelm forests, producing what the FAO calls "forest
dieback." The excessive nitrogen load essentially reverses the growth effect
of CO{-2} and reduces the capacity of the forests to act as "carbon sinks."
Economic
growth in developing countries has driven the world's recent increase in meat
production, and the higher the income, the bigger the steaks tend to be. Canadians
and Americans consume almost 100 kilograms of meat, per capita, per year (which
requires the killing of 10 billion animals). The Chinese account for 60 per cent
of the world's increase in meat production in the past 25 years. Meat consumption
increased by 30 per cent in China's cities between 1980 and 2000 and by 85 per
cent in China's rural areas. The Chinese are now the world's biggest producer
of pork and, necessarily, the world's biggest producer of methane gas from pig
manure.
The
FAO report ("Livestock's Long Shadow") says that livestock "biomass"
increased from 428 million tonnes in 1960 to 700 million tonnes in 2000. Aside
from the three billion tonnes of CO{-2} that result from simple breathing, this
vast herd of creatures emits 85 million tonnes a year of intestinal methane and
18 million tonnes of manure methane.
The
World Health Organization (WHO) has found that the consumption of fatty meat is
one of the principal causes (along with sugar and processed foods) for the obesity
epidemic in the developing world, which now suffers more from too many calories
than from too few. The WHO says that the number of obese people in the developing
world exceeds one billion; the number of malnourished people 800 million.
Greenhouse
gas emissions from beef, pork and chicken are every bit as human in origin as
the emissions from cars and trucks - and every bit as serious. As an exporter
of meat to 130 countries (with export sales of $4-billion a year), Canada produces
more than its per-capita share.
As
Pogo astutely observed so many years ago: "We have met the enemy and he is
us." Perhaps Finance Minister Jim Flaherty should amend his GHG automobile
incentive programs and introduce a combination subsidy based on Canadians' consumption
of mileage and meat.