The
End of America
By
John W. Whitehead
www.rutherford.org
The
president of the United States is an internationalist. Hes going to do what
he can to create a place where the idea of America is just thatits
an idea. Its not an actual place defined by borders.Rep. Tom
Tancredo
As
technology makes it possible for us to travel long distances faster, communicate
more easily and cheaply across space and time and stay informed about events happening
in even the most far-flung parts of the globe, the world seems to be getting smaller
by the minute.
Such
globalization, in effect, does away with national borders, leaving no one untouched.
Just think of the car sitting in your driveway with parts manufactured in eight
different countries, the food on your table, grown in far-off places and shipped
to your local grocer, and the customer service representative for your local phone
company, who just happens to be answering your call from India or Canada.
While
globalization has certainly proven to be a boon for corporations and a source
of convenience for the consumer, the geo-political aspects of globalization are
more unnerving and can clearly be seen in the merging of European nations into
a single legal and economic entity known as the European Union.
Suddenly,
the idea of a North American Uniona merging of the American, Canadian and
Mexican physical, economic and legal borders, which was once ruminated on only
by conspiracy theorists, no longer seems quite so far-fetched. In fact, according
to some commentators, academics and political analysts, the groundwork has already
been laid.
In
October 2004, the Council on Foreign Relations brought together leaders from the
United States, Mexico and Canada to study how the three countries could better
facilitate economic activity across their physical and legal borders. Building
on the groundwork already established by the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA), this task force published two documents, Trinational Call for a North
American Economic and Security Community by 2010 and Building a North American
Community, which chart a drastically different course for the United States. And
a Spring 2005 summit in Waco, Texas, attended by President Bush, President Vicente
Fox of Mexico and Canadas Prime Minister set us firmly on this path. During
the summit, the three leaders agreed to establish the Security and Prosperity
Partnership of North America (SPP), which is essentially a framework for a North
American Union.
So
what does a North American Union mean for the United States? According to some,
this could mean a completely unified North Americameaning no American currency,
no American borders and, most critically, no sovereign American law. In fact,
proposals have already been floated for a North American Court of Justice (with
the authority to overrule a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court), a Trade Tribunal
and a Charter of Fundamental Human Rights.
As
a result of such a merger, conservative activist Jerome R. Corsi foresees an immediate
challenge to our First Amendment free speech laws, as well as our Second Amendment
right to bear arms under such a unified court structure. As he explains in Human
Events, citizens of both Canada and Mexico cannot freely own firearms. Nor
can Canadians or Mexicans speak out freely without worrying about hate crimes
legislation or other political restrictions on what they may choose to say.
Particularly
worrisome is the fact that most of these proposals are being advanced in secret,
behind closed doors. President Bush signed a formal agreement that will
end the United States as we know it, CNN correspondent Lou Dobbs proclaimed,
and he took the step without the approval from either the U.S. Congress
or the people of the United States. Evidently, as Corsi has noted, the plan
is to knit together the North American Union completely under the radar
through a process of regulations and directives issued by various U.S. government
agencies.
Clearly,
the integration of the North American countries would facilitate commerce by making
it easier for corporations and immigrants to cross borders. However, this could
drastically alter Americas constitutional and legal framework and end America
as we know itnot to mention creating a monstrous bureaucracy that would
make the Office of Homeland Security look like a well-organized machine.
So
what can we do about it?
First,
we must demand that Congress closely analyze this proposed transnational merger.
Second, Americans need to demand that President Bush be more forthright about
his intentions. Third, we the people need to voice our concerns to
our elected representatives and insist that they protect our rights. Certain members
of Congress have already formed a Coalition to block the North American Union,
while some states are working on resolutions that would oppose the implementation
of a North American Union as well as any plans that would lead to the integration
of the United States into a larger international governmental structure.
However,
as with all things, it all comes down to the bottom line. For mega-corporations,
a North American Union may be the gateway to more money. But for Americans, the
bottom line must be something more than economic concernsit is maintaining
our sovereignty as a nation. Thats what the American Revolution was all
about. And along with sovereignty come the Bill of Rights and our Constitution.
They are, after all, what have made America unique and a beacon of democracy to
the rest of the world.
John
W. Whiteheads weekly commentaries are available for publication to newspapers
and web publications at no charge. Please contact marketing@rutherford.org to
obtain reprint permission.
Click
here to download a print quality image of John W. Whitehead.
Constitutional
attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford
Institute. He can be contacted at johnw@rutherford.org. Information about The
Rutherford Institute is available at www.rutherford.org.
Under
the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford
Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations
to support The Rutherford Institutes legal and educational work help to
safeguard the constitutional rights and religious freedoms of all Americans. Donations
are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit
organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.
Founded
in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford
Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services
to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated.
How
do I discontinue my membership/subscription to this e-mail list? Do not respond
to this e-mail for any reason. To discontinue your membership automatically, please
follow the link below. If you experience any technical problems and/or do not
receive confirmation that your request has been completed online, please postal
mail, phone or fax your request using the contact information listed above. Your
request will be processed within 10 days of the receipt of your request.
The
Rutherford Institute | Post Office Box 7482 | Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone:
434-978-3888 (8:30 AM - 5:00 PM) | Fax: 434-978-1789
General
Inquiries staff@rutherford.org | Legal Assistance
tristaff@rutherford.org