F-16s
at Scene of U.F.O. Sighting in Texas
By
Mike Nizza
As
the hype around a U.F.O. sighting in Texas garners an unusual amount of attention,
a local Air Force reserve base stepped up on Wednesday with a statement that either
completely debunks the story or fuels it further, depending on whom you ask and
when you ask them.
In
the days since the reported sighting which one witness said was of an object
in the sky bigger than a Wal-Mart, with the addition of many, many
strobe lights officials at the airbase initially said that none of their
aircraft were flying on the night in question.
But
they changed their story on Wednesday: now they say that 10 F-16 fighter jets
were indeed airborne between 6 p.m. and 8 p.m. local time that night, on a training
mission. That includes the 5-minute period when unidentified flying objects were
sighted.
So
is it time to say, So much for aliens in Texas dairy country?
Not
if you ask The Associated Press, which published that line in an early version
of its report before switching to a much more noncomittal lead paragraph.
One
of the people expressing doubts about the F-16 explanation was Kenneth Cherry
of the Mutual UFO Network, who asserted, This supports our story that there
was U.F.O. activity in that area. He was apparently referring to one witnesss
claim that the fighter jets were there to chase the U.F.O.
There
are several others.
Video
images that seem to show strange patterns of lights in the sky have surfaced on
local television, but none have been deemed convincing by authorities whether
they believe in aliens or not. A $5,000 reward for video proof has been offered
by a Texas businessman.
The
Dallas Morning News tries to answer an interesting question raised by the militarys
announcement: Could 10 F-16s, doing whatever they were doing, have been
mistaken for something else?
In
the article, which also runs down some alternate theories from an aviation expert
that dont pan out, the paper puts that question to Maj. Karl Lewis, a spokesman
for the 301st Fighter Wing, which operates out of the airbase. Major Lewiss
door-slamming response will doubtless strike U.F.O. buffs as both unsurprising
and revealing in its reticence:
What we do down there falls under operational
procedures that cannot be released because of operations security for our mission,
he said.
He
also seemed to slam the door on the long-cherished hope Mr. Cherry expressed to
The A.P.: What we want is the government to admit there are U.F.O.s.