The NAFTA Superhighway
Christopher
Hayes
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070827/hayes
When
completed, the highway will run from Mexico City to Toronto, slicing through the
heartland like a dagger sunk into a heifer at the loins and pulled clean to the
throat. It will be four football fields wide, an expansive gully of concrete,
noise and exhaust, swelled with cars, trucks, trains and pipelines carrying water,
wires and God knows what else. Through towns large and small it will run, plowing
under family farms, subdevelopments, acres of wilderness. Equipped with high-tech
electronic customs monitors, freight from China, offloaded into nonunionized Mexican
ports, will travel north, crossing the border with nary a speed bump, bound for
Kansas City, where the cheap goods manufactured in booming Far East factories
will embark on the final leg of their journey into the nation's Wal-Marts.
And
this NAFTA Superhighway, as it is called, is just the beginning, the first stage
of a long, silent coup aimed at supplanting the sovereign United States with a
multinational North American Union.
Even
as this plot unfolds in slow motion, the mainstream media are silent; politicians
are in denial. Yet word is getting out. Like samizdat, info about the highway
has circulated in niche media platforms old and new, on right-wing websites like
WorldNetDaily, in the pages of low-circulation magazines like the John Birch Society's
The New American and increasingly on the letters to the editor page of local newspapers.
"Construction
of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read
a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most
of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate
the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will
have the final word in trade disputes. Will the last person please take down the
flag?" There are many more where that came from. "The superhighway has
the potential to cripple the West Coast economy, as well as posing an enormous
security breach at our border," read a letter from the January 7 San Francisco
Chronicle. "So far, there has been no public participation or debate on this
important issue. Public participation and debate must begin now."
In
some senses it has. Prompted by angry phone calls and e-mail from their constituents,
local legislators are beginning to take action. In February the Montana state
legislature voted 95 to 5 for a resolution opposing "the North American Free
Trade Agreement Superhighway System" as well as "any effort to implement
a trinational political, government entity among the United States, Canada, and
Mexico." Similar resolutions have been introduced in eighteen other states
as well as the House of Representatives, where H. Con Res. 40 has attracted, as
of this writing, twenty-seven co-sponsors. Republican presidential candidates
in Iowa and New Hampshire now routinely face hostile questions about the highway
at candidate forums. Citing a spokesperson for the Romney campaign, the Concord
Monitor reports that "the road comes up at town meetings second only to immigration
policy."
Grassroots
movement exposes elite conspiracy and forces politicians to respond: It would
be a heartening story but for one small detail.
There's
no such thing as a proposed NAFTA Superhighway.
Though
opposition to the nonexistent highway is the cause célèbre of many
a paranoiac, the myth upon which it rests was not fabricated out of whole cloth.
Rather, it has been sewn together from scraps of fact.
Take,
for instance, North America's SuperCorridor Organization (NASCO), a trinational
coalition of businesses and state and local transportation agencies that, in its
own words, focuses "on maximizing the efficiency of our existing transportation
infrastructure to support international trade." Headquartered in borrowed
office space in a Dallas law firm, the organization, which has a full-time staff
of three, advocates for increased public expenditure along the main north-south
Interstate routes, including new high-tech freight-tracking technology and expedited
border crossings. It has had some success, landing federal money to pilot cargo
management technologies and winning praise from the Bush Administration. Speaking
at a NASCO conference in Texas in 2004, then-Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta
congratulated the organization for its efforts. "The people in this room
have vision," Mineta said. "Thinking ahead, thinking long term, you
began to make aggressive plans to develop...this vital artery in our national
transportation system through which so much of the NAFTA traffic flows. It flows
across our nation's busiest southern border crossing in Laredo; over North America's
busiest commercial crossing, the Ambassador Bridge in Detroit; and through Duluth
and Pembina, North Dakota, and all the places in between."
A
few years ago NASCO put on its home page a map of the United States that more
or less traced the flow that Mineta describes: Drawn in bright blue, the trade
route begins in Monterrey, Mexico, runs up I-35 and branches out after Kansas
City, along I-29 toward Winnipeg and I-94 toward Detroit and Toronto. The colorful,
cartoonlike image seemed to show right out in the open just where NASCO and its
confederates planned to build the NAFTA Superhighway. It began zipping around
the Internet.