Study
reignites debate on sweetener's safety
MILWAUKEE
- Researchers have strengthened a link between aspartame - a common sweetener
in diet sodas, medicines and sugar-free candies - and cancer in rats.
The
chemical is sold under the brand name NutraSweet.
The
study, conducted by a team of Italian scientists, demonstrates that aspartame
is particularly potent when animals are exposed in utero and during development.
The rats were exposed to the sweetener at levels above and below the recommended
daily maximums for people.
The
research was published online this month in Environmental Health Perspectives,
a U.S. government sponsored, peer-reviewed journal.
This
study raises "serious questions about the safety of the artificial sweetener
aspartame," said Mike Jacobson, executive director for the Center for Science
in the Public Interest, a public health watchdog group based in Washington, D.C.
He
is hoping the Food and Drug Administration will take notice and re-evaluate the
artificial sweetener.
But
the Calorie Control Council, an industry group, disagrees. Beth Hubrich, a registered
dietitian for the council, said the methodology was faulty, and she expressed
concern that the study would unnecessarily alarm people.
"It
is difficult to understand why the National Institute of Environmental Health
Safety would publish such studies in Environmental Health Perspectives when the
design and execution did not follow guidelines set up by the National Toxicology
Program," Ms. Hubrich wrote in an e-mail.
The
study, from the European Ramazzini Foundation of Oncology and Environmental Sciences
- an independent, non-profit foundation based in Bologna, Italy - indicated that
cancers, including lymphomas, leukemias and breast cancer, were more common in
rats exposed to the sweetener than in animals that were not exposed. And there
was dose-related response.
"On
the basis of our scientific data, we believe that aspartame should be avoided
as much as possible, especially by pregnant women and children," Morando
Soffritti, the lead researcher on the study, wrote in an e-mail.
The
acceptable daily intake of aspartame is 50 milligrams per kilogram of body weight
in the United States, and 40 milligrams per kilogram of body weight in the European
Union.
That's
a lot of aspartame. For a 150-pound U.S. adult, that's about 18 cans of diet soda
each day. For a 50-pound child, it's closer to six cans a day.
But
aspartame isn't just in diet sodas. It is also in yogurts, sugar-free desserts,
gums and medicines. Therefore, it is likely that one's daily aspartame consumption
is often underestimated, according to Mr. Soffritti.
To
investigate the effects of the sweetener on rats, Mr. Soffritti and his team separated
pregnant females into three groups. One group was given feed with a high dose
of aspartame (100 mg/kg body weight), another group was fed a lower dose (20 mg/kg
body weight) and the third group had no sweetener.
Feeding
was initiated on the 12th day of pregnancy.
The
mother rats were killed after weaning their pups, and their offspring were allowed
to live until they died of natural causes. The offspring got the same feed as
their mothers.
In
all, 400 rats were examined in this study.
When
the offspring died, they were examined for cancer and disease. The researchers
looked at their skin, fat, mammary glands, brains, pituitary glands and salivary
glands.
The
Italian team discovered a statistically significant dose-related increase of malignant
tumors in rats who were fed the artificial sweetener. The high-dose group showed
statistically significant increases in tumors - as much as 15 percentage points
higher in males - while the low-dose group showed non-significant increases in
lymphomas and leukemias in both sexes, and breast cancers in females.
The
results, Mr. Soffritti said, "call for urgent reconsideration of regulations
governing the use of aspartame as an artificial sweetener."
"This
is not just an opinion," he said, "but in the United States, it is also
the law."
The
Delaney Clause of the Food Additives Amendment of 1958 mandates that any food
additive shown to cause cancer in people or in laboratory animals - as demonstrated
in rigorous safety tests - should be considered unsafe by the Food and Drug Administration.