Sextrology:
It's all in the stars... but I wish it wasn't
The
Telegraph (UK)
New
York's favourite sextrologers are about to hit London. Bryony Gordon finds they
give a little too much information
Many
people look to their star signs for answers but when I meet the New York astrologers
Stella Starsky and Quinn Cox, I find that my star sign is possibly providing a
few too many answers.
"Ok,
that's kinky," says Stella, running a manicured finger over my birth chart.
"Cancer is your sun sign and you've got Scorpio rising. At the moment you're
probably into businessmen and nudism and things like father figures and..."
And maybe it's best if we stop right there.
"But
as you get older you'll take on more Scorpio turn-ons, like voyeurism and erotica
and..."
And?
"Biting.
A bit of pain, perhaps."
Goodness.
"You're
a bit of an exhibitionist, aren't you?"
Me?
"And
you use sex to express yourself don't you?"
I
do?
"And
friends. You use them, too, but just for booty calls."
Welcome
to the wonderful and kooky world of Starsky and Cox, a married couple who are
quite clearly not your run-of-the-mill-Mercury-is-in-retrograde astrologers.
You
wouldn't catch Russell Grant being this explicit (thank goodness) or Mystic Meg
oozing this much style (as I arrive, Stella is having a Mui Mui vs Jimmy Choo
shoe crisis).
Their
clients include Scarlett Johansson, Mario Testino and fashion designer Marc Jacobs.
They even have their own Vogue-featured jewellery line called Astercast, which
features 18-carat necklaces that you can add all your astrological elements to
in the form of charms.
Actress
Robin Wright Penn recently borrowed her stylist's Astercast necklace to wear for
a cover shoot for the New York Times Style Magazine, and loved it so much that
she wanted to keep it.
"They
are both Aries women though," says Quinn, with a mock shake of the head,
"so as you can imagine, there was a bit of a scrum." The stylist won.
The
stars love Starsky and Cox because they are sextrologers, a very different, esoteric
form of astrology of their own devising that uses our star signs to work out what
we are like as people, and what we like in bed.
And
next month they are bringing Sextrology to Britain, giving free consultations
to the public during London Fashion week.
Starsky
and Cox believe that there are actually 24 signs, not 12; each sign of the Zodiac
creates different characteristics for males and females. "Some signs are
feminine, some are masculine," explains Quinn, "and the genders use
the energy of their sign in a very different way.
An
Aries man is a fiery and explosive character, but a woman hangs back and instigates
those fires." It is, they say, astrology as psychology.
Their
best-selling book, Sextrology: The Astrology of Sex and the Sexes, which has recently
been updated for the British market, explains those differences in immense detail,
covering everything from the way we act in relationships, to how we look, to the
most fun bit, what we like sexually, and who with (ladies: steer well clear of
Sagittarian men).
Even
cynics find themselves squealing in horror when they discover that their Virgo
boyfriend is into submission, that their Leo wife delights in using handcuffs
and whips or that their Scorpio lover has a penchant for dungeons.
Starsky
and Cox don't take themselves very seriously - their zodiac cabaret act, which
sounds as if it needs to be seen to be believed, is a permanent fixture in hip
clubs on America's East Coast - but they do take their astrology seriously.
"It's
a science to us," says Stella, who met her husband more than 20 years ago
when they were both studying in France. Discovering their mutual love of the stars,
they got together and took up their study of the Zodiac professionally.
Stella
is a Capricorn; Quinn is a Libra. "We share a cardinal quality that means
we are both very assertive and like initiating things," says Stella.
"But
unfortunately neither of us has yet managed to master the art of following that
through."
And
sexually?
"Well
she's in it for herself, and I'm in it for her," smiles Quinn. "So that
works for us."
And
then they leave me to contemplate a future so explicit, I'm not sure it's suitable
for publication in a family newspaper.