Resolution
fights North American Union
Urges
U.S. to withdraw from Security and Prosperity Partnership
By
Jerome R. Corsi
A
state lawmaker in Utah has introduced a resolution encouraging the U.S. to withdraw
from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and any other bilateral
activity that would move the country toward an EU-style continental merger.
Republican
state Rep. Stephen Sandstrom introduced House Resolution 1 to the Utah legislature
this week after a similar measure passed the House last year by a 47-24 vote but
was blocked by a Senate committee just before the session's close.
"I
feel confident we will get this resolution passed this year," Sandstrom told
WND. "We learned a lot last year about our opponents, and this year we are
better prepared to anticipate their legislative moves to block us."
The
resolution reads in part: "The gradual creation of such a North American
Union from a merger of the United States, Mexico and Canada would be a direct
threat to the United States Constitution and the national independence of the
United States and would imply an eventual end to national borders within North
America."
In
a speech given in Salt Lake City to the Utah Eagle Forum's annual convention Jan.
19, Sandstrom compared the move toward a North American Union to the stealth methodology
used by corporate elite to move Europe toward the European Union. The 50-year
process began with the European Coal and Steel Agreement in 1957.
"While
the newspaper articles and reporters published the sequential events of European
integration, most people in the European Community nations thought, 'Ho-hum
no big deal,'" Sandstrom told the Eagle Forum meeting. "As a matter
of fact, the Europeans continued to sleep like Gulliver until they were jolted
awake when the euro replaced their national currencies."
When
the euro was introduced, Sandstrom explained, "fortunes were made and lost,
savings were devalued, prices and commodities were suddenly revalued, borders
essentially evaporated and individual countries could no longer control their
own immigration laws.
"Even
their national flags for which their ancestors had fought and died
were slowly being replaced by the flag of the European community, with its twelve
golden stars on a blue background," he continued.
"When
that happened, many political leaders and vast numbers of usurped citizens wanted
to stop the pan-European train and get off, but it was too late," he said.
"Too late, because they were part and parcel of the European Union
now and forever."
Sandstrom
explained he introduced H.R. 1 a second time because he wants to stop the forward
movement of the Security and Prosperity Partnership into a North American market,
following the European model in which economic integration inevitably led to political
integration.
"Just
as in the European market decades ago," he told the Eagle Forum audience,
"now there are both official and ad hoc forces here in the U.S. that continually
press for further integration and harmonization at every opportunity."
As
evidence, Sandstrom cited the free flow of labor invited to the U.S. by the failure
to secure the border with Mexico, the push by the Bush administration to expand
NAFTA and CAFTA by a series of individual free trade agreements seeking to push
open markets country by country first into Peru, followed by Columbia and
Panama and the bureaucratic trilateral working groups seeking under SPP
to integrate and harmonize U.S. administrative laws with those in Mexico and Canada.
"We
cannot and will not tolerate not without a fight the tearing down
of 232 years of sovereign progress in which American has protected the etched-in-stone,
under-God principles that were bequeathed to us by our founding fathers,"
he concluded.
According
to tabulation on StopTheNau.org, 13 states have now passed similar resolutions
opposing the SPP and the movement toward a future North American Union.
Utah
is among six states considering a resolution against the SPP.
As
WND reported, Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va., has introduced into the U.S. House of
Representatives a resolution expressing congressional opposition to construction
of a NAFTA super highway system or entry into a North American Union with Mexico
and Canada.