Psychologist
required to take ethics classes
By
KATE THAYER
ST.
CHARLES The license of a St. Charles psychologist accused of practicing
witchcraft on patients has been placed on probation because of claims that she
lived with patients, traveled with them, and engaged in social relationships.
Letitia
Libman received the one-year license probation earlier this month, state records
show.
She
may practice during that time, but must pass ethics and professional practice
classes, along with a risk-management course, meet twice monthly with a supervising
clinical psychologist, provide the state with quarterly reports, and notify the
state with employment or home address changes.
There
are several pending lawsuits in Kane County, filed in 2005 and 2006, that accuse
Libman of using witchcraft as therapy, making sexual advances on patients, and
other inappropriate behavior. Libman, who once practiced at a St. Charles facility
run by Delnor-Community Hospital, has denied the allegations.
Attempts
to reach Libman and her attorney, Richard Barrett, on Friday were unsuccessful.
Libmans
probation began after a 60-day suspension when she could not practice, according
to the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation.
Libman
agreed to the suspension and probation terms earlier this year, according to state
records.
Delnor
spokesman Brian Griffin declined to comment because of the pending litigation,
which includes the hospital as a defendant.
Richard
Stavins, who represents the four adults and a child suing Libman and Delnor, said
Friday that the suspension of Libmans license had no bearing on the lawsuit.
However,
he was seeking information on the claim that led to the state investigation.
So
far, the state has refused to hand over the records, Stavins said. The parties
are scheduled to meet in court Aug. 23, when Stavins will ask Circuit Judge Keith
Brown to force the state to turn over the records.
There
might be some good stuff in there, Stavins said.
The
complaint against Libman issued by the state briefly describes that Libman violated
professional boundaries with her patients by permitting a former patient to live
in [her home] and accompany her on a trip to Iowa. [Libman] also engaged in a
social relationship with another former patient and said patients friend.