Intelligence
Analyst Exposed by Washington Insider
Gary
S. Bekkum
December 15, 2006
Leaked
background information from Washington insider Dan T. Smith has made its way into
a widely distributed email list, resulting in the public exposure of a top intelligence
analyst.
His
name is [redacted], also widely known (thanks in part to Jon Ronson's book, "The
Men Who Stare at Goats") as 'Ron,' the real-life Fox Mulder of the CIA. In
1998 [redacted] appeared in a Pulitzer Prize winning story in the New York Times,
concerning his role in the CIA investigation of a controversial missile technology
transfer between Hughes Electronic Corporation and China. Today [redacted] sports
a shiny new DIA military email address, lending some support to Mr. Smith's claim
that [redacted] has moved to [redacted] under Director of National Intelligence
John Negroponte.
A
series of allegations were passed by Mr. Smith to Victor Martinez, and shortly
thereafter appeared in a series of emails distributed by Martinez to an extensive
list of contacts, including numerous scientists with government email addresses,
a Nobel prize winner, various journalists, a former Director of the CIA, and other
former and present government employees and consultants. Several of the recipients
are high ranking intelligence officials and consultants to the U.S. government
in the area of national security.
Allegations
coming from Mr. Smith include claims that bits of actual top secret information
had been passed in a series of bogus UFO papers, popularly known as the MJ-12
documents. At issue was the identity of "Falcon," an alleged member
of the so-called AVIARY group of U.S. government insiders interested in the impact
of the UFO question on national security.
Smith
mentions a 1988 meeting at the CIA between Air Force Colonels Hennessey and Weaver
and the CIA's [redacted] to discuss questionable activities by ex-AFOSI Special
Agent Richard C. Doty. Doty is well known for his involvement in Air Force counter-intelligence
activities involving UFO's. One item of discussion at the 1988 meeting was the
result of a polygraph test administered to Agent Doty. When CIA analyst [redacted]
and [redacted], a polygraph expert, disputed Hennessey's claim that Doty had failed
the test, Smith says they walked out.
In
an email response to a request for confirmation of Mr. Smith's allegations, [redacted]
offered the following opinion:
"It
was Doty who claimed Col. Hennessey was the Falcon, and it was Doty who claimed
Col. Hennessey had provided him (Doty) with UFO documents for release to the public.
My opinion is that Doty personally forged these documents, that he used the Falcon
name to cover his tracks, and that he had absolutely no professional or personal
relationship with Col. Hennessey."
According
to his official USAF biography, Colonel Hennessey is "a member of the Defense
Intelligence Senior Executive Service, is Director of Security, Counterintelligence
and Special Program Oversight, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, Washington,
D.C. He is responsible for security and CI (counter-intelligence) policy as well
as management oversight of all Air Force Security and Special Access Programs,
which includes ensuring the security of various research projects with significant
potential impact on the defense capabilities of this country."
Note:
This story originally appeared in July, 2006. It was removed from publication
until another source verified the information provided by Mr. Dan Smith.
Previously
Starstream Research was erroneously informed that a source had provided false
information about the results of a polygraph examination allegedly discussed at
a meeting between CIA and USAF personnel. Eventually we killed the original story
when concerns were raised by a government officer.
In
an email addressed to Starstream Research founder Gary S. Bekkum, the officer
had requested removal of his name and position, as "These are irrelevant
to your story and compromise personal and national security." Following redaction
of the sensitive information, an associate of the officer raised additional concerns
about the content of the story, resulting in an editorial decision to remove the
article.
New
information has forced a re-evaluation of our original story.
As
a result of the new information, Starstream Research has made an editorial decision
to re-release the original story, as originally written, with only the name and
position of the officer redacted.
www.starstreamresearch.com