Astronomers
Mull Mystery Gamma Ray Burst
Four
articles in the journal Nature discuss a mysterious new type of gamma ray burst
that doesn't fit with our current model of supernovae. Termed a "hybrid gamma-ray
burst", the phenomenon was first observed with NASA's Swift satellite on
14 June 2006, and has since been studied with the Hubble Space Telescope and large
ground-based observatories.
"Gamma-ray
bursts are the most powerful explosions in the Universe, yet they are random and
fleeting, never appearing in the same place twice. The only way to study them
in detail is to observe them as quickly as possible with the most powerful telescopes
we have," explains Penn State's Derek Fox, author of one of the papers. "This
burst - unlike all other long gamma-ray bursts we have seen - was not accompanied
by a supernova, for reasons we do not yet fully understand."
Gamma-ray
bursts usually signal the birth of a new black hole, and astronomers believe this
to be the case with the hybrid burst. It is unclear, however, what kind of object
or objects exploded or merged to create the black hole or, perhaps, something
even more bizarre. The hybrid burst exhibits properties of the two known classes
of gamma-ray bursts, characterized as "long" and "short,"
yet has other features that cannot be explained.
Long
gamma-ray bursts last for more than two seconds and appear to be from the core
collapse of a massive star, forming a black hole. Short gamma-ray bursts, which
are under two seconds and often last just a few milliseconds, appear to result
from the merger of two neutron stars or a neutron star with a black hole, which
subsequently creates a new or bigger black hole.
"We
have lots of data on this [hybrid] burst and have dedicated lots of observation
time to it, and we just can't figure out what exploded," said Neil Gehrels
of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. "All the data seem to point to a new
but perhaps not-so-uncommon kind of cosmic explosion." The hybrid burst,
called GRB 060614, was 1.6 billion light years away in the constellation Indus.
Despite
its 102-second-long emission, the hybrid burst lacked the hallmark of a supernova,
or star explosion, commonly seen shortly after long bursts. Also, the burst's
host galaxy has a low star-formation rate with few stars massive enough to produce
long gamma-ray bursts and supernovae. "This burst was close enough to detect
a supernova if it existed," said Avishay Gal-Yam of Caltech, lead author
on another Nature report, "but even Hubble didn't see anything." "We
have been tracking these bursts regularly with Hubble, and only a short burst
would be expected to disappear like this. It was a huge surprise when we looked
at these data and found nothing there," added Fox.
Certain
properties of the hybrid burst suggest that it behaved more like a short burst
from a merger of stars than a long burst from a single collapsing star. But no
previous theoretical model of mergers can support a sustained release of gamma-ray
energy for 102 seconds.
Speculating
on the nature of the hybrid burst, astronomers writing in the Astrophysical Journal,
suggest that a "scaled down" version looks a lot like a "normal"
short burst. "It may be that many - or perhaps all - bursts that normally
would have been classified as short, have a longer-lasting and dimmer emission
of lower-energy gamma-rays, which becomes more prominent when they are as luminous
as this very bright burst," explained astronomer Peter Meszaros. "If
so, the new puzzle is to understand what gives rise to these dimmer and longer-lasting
emissions - and this puzzle is in virtually uncharted territory."
While
scientists remain undecided on whether this was a long short burst from a merger
or a long burst from a star explosion that, for some unknown reason, did not produce
a supernova, most conclude that some new process must be at play: either the model
of mergers creating second-long bursts needs a major overhaul, or the progenitor
star from an explosion is intrinsically different from the kind that makes supernovae.
Source:
Penn State University