Scientist
questions use of depleted uranium munitions
AM
- Thursday, 2 November , 2006 08:24:00
Reporter: Rafael Epstein
TONY
EASTLEY: America and Britain's use of depleted uranium munitions has again been
queried by a scientist who says information about their dangers has been suppressed.
The
man who worked on a definitive World Health Organisation study on the dangers
of the munitions, says studies pointing to a potential problem never saw the light
of day.
Europe
Correspondent Rafael Epstein.
RAFAEL
EPSTEIN: In the 1991 war with Iraq, the United States fired 320 tonnes of depleted
uranium munitions. In 2003 they used as much as 2,000 tonnes. This material is
used because of its ability to penetrate heavy armour, like the hull of a tank.
When
the US and Britain defend their use of these materials, they sometimes cite a
World Health Organisation study compiled in 2001. It brought together all the
available evidence on whether or not such munitions could lead to sickness and
even cancer.
Dr
Keith Baverstock was a senior radiation adviser with the WHO. He told the BBC
a study showing the munitions could be carcinogenic was kept out of the final
report or monograph.
KEITH
BAVERSTOCK: When it wasn't included in the monograph I, with two other colleagues,
prepared a paper for the open literature and the WHO did not permit me to submit
that paper for publication.
RAFAEL
EPSTEIN: And he believes the United States helped stop the publication.
KEITH
BAVERSTOCK: It is naive to think that in institutions like the United Nations
one is free from political influences. The member states have their own agendas.
RAFAEL
EPSTEIN: But Dr Mike Repacholi disagrees. He coordinated the entire report as
head of the WHO's Radiation and Environmental Health Unit.
MIKE
REPACHOLI: Depleted uranium is basically safe. You can touch depleted uranium
for hours and not cause any radiation damage. You can ingest it and it's excreted
through the body, 99 per cent of it goes within about a day. You would have to
ingest a huge amount of depleted uranium dust to cause any adverse health effect.
RAFAEL
EPSTEIN: Dr Repacholi told the BBC, the studies showing possibly adverse effects
were not included at the time, because they were not conclusive and could not
stand up to scientific scrutiny. Since then there have been more studies on the
possible dangers caused by such weapons. They suggest that depleted uranium chemically
alters DNA and could be a precursor to tumour growth.
Much
of this work has been done by scientists at the US Department of Defence, but
their work has since ceased.
In
London this is Rafael Epstein for AM.