“Dark energy” an age-old phenomenon, study finds

Nov. 16, 2006
Courtesy Johns Hopkins University
and World Science staff

A mys­te­ri­ous force making the uni­verse ex­pand faster and faster—discovered eight years ago—is­n’t new, a stu­dy has con­clud­ed: it has ex­isted for most of cos­mic his­tory.

As long as nine billion years ago, when the cos­mos was about one third its pre­sent age, “the stuff we call ‘dark en­er­gy’... was start­ing to make its pres­ence felt,” said Ad­am Riess of The Johns Hop­kins Uni­ver­si­ty in Bal­ti­more, Md. He led a re­search team con­d­uc­t­ing the work.

The finding, the scientists said, is in line with Al­bert Ein­s­tein’s ear­ly sug­ges­tion that a re­pul­sive form of gra­v­i­ty is an in­t­rin­sic fea­ture of emp­ty space.

On the other hand, they added, the result tends to con­f­lict with some com­pet­ing views hold­ing that the dark en­er­gy’s strength va­ries over time.

“Although dark en­er­gy ac­counts for more than 70 per­cent of the en­er­gy of the uni­verse, we know very lit­tle about it, so each clue is pre­cious,” said Riess, who is cre­d­ited with co-dis­co­vering the dark en­er­gy in the late 1990s.

Ein­stein first con­ceived of a re­pul­sive force in space in an at­tempt to ex­plain how the uni­verse held its size against the in­ward pull of its own grav­i­ty. If this op­pos­ing force did­n’t ex­ist, he rea­soned, the cos­mos would col­lapse un­der the com­bined grav­i­ty of ever­ything in it.

But he even­tu­al­ly dropped the idea. It re­mained an his­tor­i­cal cu­ri­os­i­ty un­til 1998, when Riess and oth­ers de­tected the ac­cel­er­a­tion ex­pan­sion of space. As­tro­physi­cists con­clud­ed that Ein­stein may have been right af­ter all: there was a re­pul­sive form of grav­i­ty. They dubbed it dark en­er­gy.

Since then, they’ve been try­ing to unco­ver two of its key prop­er­ties: its strength and per­ma­nence. These could ult­i­mate­ly help ex­p­lain what it is.

For the new study, Riess and col­leagues used NASA’s Hub­ble Space Tel­e­scope to peer far across the uni­verse. This equates to look­ing back in time, be­cause it takes time for the dis­tant ob­jects’ light to reach us. Thus we see them as they were that much time ago.

The re­search­ers stud­ied a class of ex­plod­ing stars, called su­per­novae, used to trace the ex­pan­sion and ex­pan­sion rate of the uni­verse at var­i­ous times. The meth­od, Riess said, is akin to watch­ing fire­flies at night. Be­cause they all glow with about the same strength, you can judge their dis­tance from their ap­par­ent bright­ness.

A si­mi­lar tech­nique was used to un­co­ver the cos­mic ac­ce­ler­a­tion to be­gin with. Later work filled in some de­tails. Hub­ble sight­ings of far-off su­per­novae, re­ported in 2004 by Riess and col­leagues, in­di­cat­ed that mat­ter dom­i­nat­ed the ear­ly cos­mos, slow­ing down its ex­pan­sion with its grav­i­ty. But the swell­ing be­gan to speed up some five bil­lion to six bil­lion years ago, as the eerie re­pul­sion be­gan to overpower grav­i­ty.

The new find­ings, Riess said, show that dark en­er­gy was ob­struct­ing the grav­i­ta­tion­al pull of the mat­ter in the uni­verse even be­fore it be­gan win­ning that grav­i­ta­tion­al “tug of war.”

The re­sults stem from an anal­y­sis of the 24 most dis­tant su­per­novae known, most found with­in the last two years. By meas­ur­ing the uni­verse’s rel­a­tive size over time, as­tro­physi­cists tracked its growth spurts, much as a par­ent gauges a child’s growth spurts us­ing marks on a door­frame. Dis­tant su­per­novae pro­vide the “marks” for Hub­ble.

“After we sub­tract the grav­i­ty from the known mat­ter in the uni­verse, we can see the dark en­er­gy push­ing to get out,” said the Uni­ver­si­ty of West­ern Ken­tuck­y’s Lou Strol­ger, a su­per­no­va hunt­er on Riess’ team. The find­ings are to ap­pear in the Feb. 10 is­sue of The As­tro­phys­i­cal Jour­nal.

 

For more stories from the news - Visit - Click Here

To Return to The 'X' Zone Radio Show Main Page - Click Here