Airspace
Activist Eyes Unfriendly Skies
By
MATT HAMPTON
When
Alan Gross of Flushing looked out his window Aug. 13 of this year, he was looking
for a blimp. What he saw instead floated like a butterfly, but stung him like
a bee.
Absent
a dirigible, Gross was concerned by the presence of contrails over the Manhattan
skyline, zigzagging in drunken Xs across the heavens.
Contrails
are the condensation tail left by an airplane as it travels through an area of
cold air while expelling engine exhaust. Its similar to the process that
occurs when a person can see their breath on a cold day.
Gross,
who had been a vocal advocate for the establishment of a blimp port at the defunct
Flushing Airport a few years ago, produced a camcorder and recorded hours of the
atmospheric ballet, all the while concerned that its location over Manhattan
may have been nefarious in nature.
I
looked out the window and saw this Tic-Tac-Toe in the sky, Gross said. I
was flabbergasted.
Gross
was concerned that the trails were acting unusually, but was unsure exactly how
to classify what he was seeing. After exhaustive Internet research, Gross concluded
that the contrails he was viewing were actually chemtrails. Chemtrails
refer to contrails that some citizens, such as Gross, believe may contain chemicals
for the purposes of weather manipulation.
Feeding
the fear that these alleged chemtrails have induced are two pieces of federal
legislation currently being considered in the House and Senate. Respectively U.S.
House Bill 2995 and U.S. Senate Bill 517, the bills are short legislative tidbits
that call for the formation of committees to explore the possibility of weather
manipulation.
Senate
Bill 517, introduced by Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-Texas) months before
Hurricane Katrina made landfall in New Orleans, has been lambasted by its critics
outside the Beltway for being too vague and for promoting cloud seeding, a practice
that some environmentalists say could be harmful. As well, the bill has been criticized
for implying ownership over weather in a certain area, which is a
slippery slope in a global ecosystem.
A
message left at Senator Hutchinsons office was not returned, though the
language in both S. 517 and HR 2995 both lack any mention of ongoing atmospheric
experimentation or chemtrails.
The
Chemtrail theory, in my mind, is a misunderstanding of jet contrails in the upper
atmosphere, said Thomas Downs, of the meteorological consulting firm Weather
2000. Contrails tend to do different things as winds in the upper atmosphere
increase.
Downs
continued to say that when contrails occur in a high concentration at various
altitudes, they can create all kinds of unexpected visuals. Downs was quick to
add that past weather modification programs, including a 20-year government program
called Project Stormfury, which sought to lessen the destructive force of hurricanes,
have all been abandoned due to high cost and diminutive result.
Geoff
Brady, producer of WBAIs Law and Disorder radio program, is
currently working on a documentary about weather modification, taking a special
look at chemtrails.
Once
you do notice that this is going on, he said, then you do look at
the sky a little differently.
Based
on research gathered by the Agricultural Defense Coalition, Brady believes that
contrails are using particulate compounds, composed of aluminum oxide and barium
combined with atmospheric antennae to cool and warm particular areas of
the atmosphere.
The
goal of such a program, Brady contends, would be to lessen or increase the intensity
of storms in a given area by manipulating the ionosphere.
Downs,
however, thinks the theory might be too farfetched.
[One]
problem with dispersing chemicals so high up in the atmosphere is that they will
inevitably be dispersed randomly by the very strong winds of the jet stream,
he said. The particles will get so diffuse that the original intent of what
they are supposed to be doing would be almost impossible to achieve.
After
doing his own research, Gross had a theory of his own about the chemtrails.
What
theyre trying to do is geo-engineer the planet to whatever they want to
do, he said.
Speaking scientifically, however, Downs had some advice.
In scientific terms, we look for the simplest explanation thats
usually the correct one.